| Case ID |
0457c167-088a-4ed2-89db-bc23676bcc62 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Second Appeal No. 129 of 1952 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 05, 1952 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court dismissed the appeal of Muhammad Shafi against the Municipal Committee of Murree's decision to dismiss him from his position as a taxation superintendent. The court held that municipal servants serve at the pleasure of the committee, and therefore, the dismissal was valid under the provisions of the Punjab Municipal Act. The court concluded that Muhammad Shafi's remedy did not lie in civil suit but rather in an appeal to the Commissioner or a petition for revision to the Government. The court emphasized that the committee had the authority to discharge municipal servants with one month's notice, and even though Shafi argued that he was wrongfully dismissed without due process, the court found that the committee had acted within its rights as outlined in the relevant laws. |
| Summary |
In the case of Muhammad Shafi vs. The Municipal Committee, Murree, the Lahore High Court addressed the issue of wrongful dismissal of a municipal servant under the Punjab Municipal Act (III of 1911). The court examined the legal framework governing the employment of municipal servants and concluded that such employees hold their positions at the pleasure of the committee. This case highlighted the distinction between dismissal and discharge, clarifying that while a committee may dismiss an employee after an inquiry, it can discharge them without one. The court ruled that Shafi's appeal was not competent in civil court and directed him to seek remedies through administrative channels such as appeals to the Commissioner, emphasizing the importance of understanding the legal rights and remedies available to public servants. This case serves as a critical reference for municipal employment law and the rights of public servants in Pakistan, particularly regarding the procedural requirements for dismissal and the legal implications of employment at pleasure. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Municipal Committee, Murree
|
| Judges |
M. R. Kayani, J
|
| Lawyers |
Mahmood Ahmad Minro
|
| Petitioners |
Muhammad Shafi
|
| Respondents |
The Municipal Committee, Murree
|
| Citations |
1953 SLD 98,
1953 PLD 163
|
| Other Citations |
Mir Allah Bakhsh v. District Board, Rawalpindi P L D 1951 Lab. 52,
R. Venkata Rao v. Secretary of State I L R 1937 Mad. 532,
Shenton v. Smith 1895 A C 229,
Gould v. Stuart 1896 A C 575,
Smyth v. Latham Bingham's Reports Vol. IX p. 692,
Notely v. London County Council (1915) 3 K B 580,
Abraham Reuben v. The Karachi Municipality A I R 1929 Sind 69,
Gokak Municipality v. Rajaram Shridhar Kulkarni A I R 1940 Bom. 386,
Chellam Aiyar v. Corporation of Madras 42 I C 513,
High Commissioner for India and Pakistan v. I. M. Lall A I R 1948 P C 121 -P L D 1948 P C 150
|
| Laws Involved |
Punjab Municipal Act (III of 1911)
|
| Sections |
45(1),
39
|