| Case ID |
04028eae-4f5f-4b22-aab7-088f0fc6b34d |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
ITA NO. 3360/LB/2018 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 22, 2024 |
| Hearing Date |
Apr 22, 2024 |
| Decision |
The decision in this case revolves around the appeal filed by CIR, RTO, Lahore against Mian Muhammad Jamil. The tribunal reviewed the arguments presented by the appellant's lawyer, Mst. Lubna Shah, and weighed the evidence accordingly. The Tribunal's decision, delivered on the same day as the hearing, reflects the application of relevant tax laws and the principles of justice. The absence of the respondent's representation may have influenced the outcome, as the appellant was able to present their case without counter-arguments. The final ruling will be documented in detail in the tribunal's order, ensuring transparency and adherence to legal standards. |
| Summary |
This case pertains to an appeal filed by the CIR, RTO, Lahore against Mian Muhammad Jamil concerning tax-related matters. The Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue in Lahore held the hearing on April 22, 2024, where the appellant was represented by Mst. Lubna Shah, while the respondent did not appear. The case emphasizes the importance of representation in legal proceedings and the impact it can have on the outcome. The Tribunal, presided over by Zahid Sikandar, delivered its decision on the same day as the hearing, highlighting the efficiency of the judicial process in tax matters. The case serves as a reminder of the procedural requirements necessary for both parties in appeals. Keywords related to tax law, appeals, and legal representation are critical for understanding the implications of this case. |
| Court |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Zahid Sikandar
|
| Lawyers |
Mst. Lubna Shah
|
| Petitioners |
CIR, RTO, Lahore
|
| Respondents |
Mian Muhammad Jamil
|
| Citations |
2024 SLD 4982
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Not available
|
| Sections |
Not available
|