| Case ID |
03a4857a-ebcf-4a33-8d0a-880eef694140 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal Appeal No. 166 and Criminal Revision No. |
| Decision Date |
Jun 22, 2010 |
| Hearing Date |
Jun 22, 2010 |
| Decision |
On June 22, 2010, the Lahore High Court, presided by Justice Waqar Hassan Mir, delivered a comprehensive judgment acquitting Makhdoom Javed Hashmi of all charges. The court meticulously analyzed the procedural lapses and legal inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, particularly highlighting the non-compliance with Section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that offenses under certain sections can only be prosecuted upon a complaint from the Federal or Provincial Government. The judgment emphasized that the local police lacked the authority to register and prosecute the case without the necessary governmental directive. Furthermore, the court found that the prosecution failed to establish the requisite mens rea for the offenses charged, rendering the conviction unsustainable. By setting aside the earlier conviction, the court underscored the paramount importance of adhering to due process and statutory mandates in criminal proceedings. This landmark decision reinforces the judiciary's commitment to safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring that prosecutions are conducted lawfully and justly. |
| Summary |
In a landmark decision on June 22, 2010, the Lahore High Court, under the esteemed leadership of Justice Waqar Hassan Mir, delivered a pivotal judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 166 and Criminal Revision No. 70 of 2004. The case involved petitioner Makhdoom Javed Hashmi and the respondent, THE State, with the primary charges stemming from multiple sections of the Penal Code, including 124-A for sedition and 131/109 for abetting mutiny, among others. The crux of the case revolved around the alleged dissemination of defamatory content aimed at creating disaffection towards the Pakistan Army and the government, leading to Hashmi's conviction in the lower court.
The Lahore High Court meticulously dissected the procedural frameworks invoked during the prosecution, particularly spotlighting violations of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), specifically Section 196. This section unequivocally mandates that prosecutions under certain Penal Code sections require a formal complaint from the concerned Federal or Provincial Government, a protocol seemingly bypassed by the local police authorities in this instance. The court highlighted that the absence of such a complaint from the Federal Government invalidated the prosecution's standing, thereby nullifying the subsequent investigation and trial processes.
Moreover, the judgment underscored the prosecution's failure to establish the necessary mens rea, or the intent required for the crimes charged. Despite the gravity of the allegations, the evidence presented did not convincingly demonstrate Hashmi's deliberate attempts to incite mutiny or sedition, rendering the convictions untenable. The court also noted the suppression of critical facts, such as the complainant's retired military status and the involvement of serving military personnel among the prosecution witnesses, which further cast doubt on the integrity of the prosecution's case.
In her comprehensive analysis, Justice Mir emphasized the sanctity of due process and the imperative that all legal procedures be scrupulously adhered to, ensuring that individual liberties are not infringed upon by arbitrary state actions. By setting aside the previous convictions and acquitting Makhdoom Javed Hashmi, the Lahore High Court sent a resounding message about the judiciary's role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that prosecutions are conducted with legitimate authority and substantial evidence.
This judgment not only exonerates Hashmi but also serves as a critical precedent for future cases involving similar procedural oversights and underscores the necessity for governmental compliance in prosecutorial processes. It highlights the judiciary's vigilance in safeguarding against miscarriages of justice and reinforces the foundational legal principles that govern fair trial standards in Pakistan's legal landscape. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Federal Government,
Pakistan Army,
State,
National Assembly
|
| Judges |
WAQAR HASSAN MIR
|
| Lawyers |
Not available
|
| Petitioners |
MAKHDOOM JAVED HASHMI
|
| Respondents |
THE State
|
| Citations |
2010 SLD 2953,
2010 PCRLJ 1809
|
| Other Citations |
Muhammad Khan v. Government of West Pakistan PLD 1960 W.P. Lahore 434,
Bashir Ahmad v. The State 2000 PCr.LJ 902,
Fazal-i-Raziq v. Riaz Ahmad PLD 1978 Lah. 1082,
Gokulchand Dwarkadas v. The King PLD 1948 PC 11,
Dost Muhammad v. The State 1976 PCr.LJ 184,
Salman Taseer v. Judge Special Court 1993 SCMR 71 rel.
|
| Laws Involved |
Penal Code (XLV of 1860),
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
|
| Sections |
124-A,
131/109,
505(a),
468,
471,
500,
469,
196
|