| Case ID |
03972150-cb56-43c7-a1cd-d4fe721efd3a |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Peshawar-267 of 1988 |
| Decision Date |
Aug 29, 1988 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to the application for a copy of the impugned order being made after the expiry of the limitation period. The appellant's claim that the application was submitted on 14-1-1988 was contradicted by evidence from witnesses and the register of applications. The court found that the application was actually filed on 14-2-1988, which was beyond the allowable time frame for filing the appeal. Therefore, the appeal cannot be entertained and is considered dismissed. |
| Summary |
In the case at hand, the Labour Appellate Tribunal addressed an appeal regarding the seniority and promotion of employees under the purview of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969). The pivotal issue revolved around the timeliness of the appeal, particularly the application for a copy of the impugned order. The court scrutinized the dates provided by various witnesses and the application register. It was determined that the application was submitted post the limitation period, leading to dismissal of the appeal. This case underscores the importance of adhering to procedural timelines in legal proceedings, especially in labor disputes where seniority and promotion are at stake. The decision serves as a reminder for litigants and their legal representatives to ensure compliance with established deadlines to avoid dismissal on procedural grounds. Keywords such as 'Labor Law', 'Industrial Relations', 'Legal Appeal', and 'Timeliness in Legal Proceedings' are vital for understanding the implications of this ruling and could be beneficial for SEO optimization in legal discussions. |
| Court |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi
|
| Lawyers |
Muhammad Nawaz,
Muhammad Akram,
Rana Muhammad Akhtar,
Nemo
|
| Petitioners |
Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways, Peshawar
|
| Respondents |
Muhammad Siddique,
Respondent No. 3,
Zafar Iqbal
|
| Citations |
1989 SLD 1517,
1989 PLC 718
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
|
| Sections |
S. 37
|