| Case ID |
0392af8d-2406-4f96-95f0-21951a98e5c1 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE Nos. 22, 23, 24 AND 25 OF 1970 |
| Decision Date |
Sep 28, 1971 |
| Hearing Date |
Sep 24, 1971 |
| Decision |
The court held that when a partner retires from a partnership, the amount received by them is merely their share in the partnership and does not constitute a transfer of their interest in the partnership assets. The court determined that the goodwill is a self-created asset that does not incur any tax liability under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal's decision that the amount received by the partners upon retirement, which included goodwill, is not taxable as capital gains was affirmed. The ruling clarified that no transfer of interest occurred, and thus no capital gains tax applied. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the tax implications of capital gains when a partner retires from a partnership. The primary legal question was whether the amount received by the partners, which included their share of goodwill, constituted a taxable capital gain under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Gujarat High Court ruled that the retirement of a partner does not equate to a transfer of interest in the partnership assets. The concept of 'transfer' under the Act was analyzed, concluding that a partner's share is essentially a right to profits and not a direct ownership of specific assets, including goodwill. The court emphasized that goodwill is a self-created asset and does not incur any actual cost to the partners, reinforcing that no capital gains tax should be levied in such scenarios. This ruling is significant for understanding the treatment of goodwill and capital gains tax in partnership dissolutions and retirements. The case highlights critical legal principles regarding the nature of partnership interests and the tax implications of asset transfers, making it a key reference for tax law practitioners and accountants navigating similar issues. |
| Court |
Gujarat High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
P.N. Bhagwati, C.J.,
P.D. Desai, J.
|
| Lawyers |
K.H. Kaji,
R.M. Gandhi,
K.C. Patel
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Mohanbhai Pamabhai
|
| Citations |
1973 SLD 628 = (1973) 91 ITR 393
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. RM Amin [1971] 82 ITR 194 (Guj.),
CIT v. Bankey Lal Vaidya [1971] 79 ITR 594; [1971] 3 SCR 406 (SC),
CIT v. Chunilal Prabhudas & Co. [1970] 76 ITR 566 (Cal.),
CIT v. Dewas Cine Corporation [1968] 68 ITR 240 ; [1968] 2 SCR 173 (SC),
CIT v. K. Rathanam Nadar [1969] 71 ITR 433 (Mad.),
R.C. Cooper v. UOI [1970] 40 Comp. Cas. 325; [1970] 3 SCR 530; AIR 1970 SC 564,
Jagdev Singh Mumick v. CIT [1971] 81 ITR 500 (Delhi),
Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa AIR 1966 SC 1300,
Trego v. Hunt[1986] AC 7 (HL),
Velo Industries v. Collector [1971] 80 ITR 291 (Guj.) (FB)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
45,
2(14),
2(47),
48
|