Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 038db27e-d8c8-4e99-95ee-5237093f61f9
Body View case body.
Case Number 29963
Decision Date
Hearing Date
Decision The court held that the right of residence free of rent in a property can be treated as an interest in property which ceases on the death of the deceased. However, despite the cesser of such interest, the benefit arising therefrom is not exigible to estate duty if it is not capable of valuation under section 40. The deceased had an interest in the property that ceased upon the death of the widow, but the benefit that arose was not capable of valuation, hence, not liable to estate duty. The court emphasized the importance of the capacity of the interest to yield income for establishing liability under the Estate Duty Act.
Summary This case revolves around the interpretation of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, specifically concerning the valuation of interests that cease upon death. The primary issue examined was whether the deceased's right of residence, which was free of rent, constituted an interest in property that could be charged with estate duty upon the death of the widow. The court concluded that while the right of residence was indeed an interest, the benefit arising from its cesser was not liable for estate duty due to its incapacity for valuation under section 40. This case highlights the nuances of property rights and valuation in estate duty assessments, making it a pivotal reference for similar future cases.
Court Bombay High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges M.N. Chandurkar, M.H. Kania
Lawyers R.J. Kolah, S.E. Dastur, C.N. Mistry, R.J. Joshi, R.L. Buiani
Petitioners D.J. Gazdar
Respondents Controller of Estate Duty
Citations 1982 SLD 1322 = (1982) 138 ITR 607
Other Citations Smt. Mrudula Nareshchandra v. CED [1975] 100 ITR 297 (Guj.), CED v. Fakirchand Fatehchand Sachdev [1982] 134 ITR 268 (Bom.), Manian Natesan v. CED [1965] 56 ITR (ED) 5 (Mad.)
Laws Involved Estate Duty Act, 1953
Sections 7(1), 40