Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 037b3afc-6286-45e5-a41a-8876e9df2585
Body View case body.
Case Number Writ Petition No 26.08(sic) of 2016
Decision Date Oct 18, 2017
Hearing Date
Decision The writ petition was dismissed based on the findings that the police were bound to register a case upon receiving a cognizable offence report. The court found that the Ex-officio Justice of Peace acted correctly by directing the registration of the case against the petitioner, as the allegations constituted a cognizable offence under section 341, P.P.C. The police's failure to register the case was deemed a violation of statutory law.
Summary This case revolves around the obligations of police officers under the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), particularly concerning the registration of First Information Reports (FIRs). The petitioner challenged the decision of the Justice of Peace, who ordered the registration of a case against him. The petitioner argued that no cognizable offence had occurred, as concluded by the police during their inquiry. The High Court, however, upheld the Justice of Peace's decision, emphasizing that upon receiving information about a cognizable offence, the police had a mandatory duty to register the case and conduct an investigation. This case highlights the critical nature of adhering to legal protocols in the registration of FIRs and the investigative responsibilities of law enforcement. Keywords for SEO: Criminal Procedure Code, FIR registration, High Court decisions, Justice of Peace, cognizable offences.
Court High Court (AJ&K)
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MOHAMMAD SHERAZ KIANI, TUSEEF AHMED KHAN
Lawyers Saqib Ahmed Abbasi
Petitioners MOHAMMAD SHERAZ KIANI
Respondents 3 OTHERS, JUSTICE OF PEACE/SESSIONS JUDGE BAGH
Citations 2018 SLD 619, 2018 MLD 275
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Sections 154, 22-A, 22-B