Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 0335d98e-7d3e-461a-bba0-75a67bd5949d
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Revision No. 86 of 2015
Decision Date Sep 07, 2015
Hearing Date Sep 07, 2015
Decision The petition filed by the petitioner under Order XI, Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed by the Appellate Court. The court found that the remedy sought did not align with the spirit of the law, as the stage for 'discovery and inspection' had already passed. The application was vague and merely requested the production of two documents without sufficient justification. The court concluded that the impugned order was correct, and the petition was not suitable for regular hearing.
Summary In the case of Civil Revision No. 86 of 2015, the petitioner Muhammad Ashraf Khan sought to compel the production of certain documents through an application under Order XI, Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Code. The High Court, presided over by Justice Muhammad Alam, dismissed this application, stating that the request was vague and did not adhere to the established legal framework for document production. The ruling emphasized the importance of following procedural guidelines and the necessity of presenting a clear and justified request for document disclosure. The court ruled that the application did not serve the interests of either party and that the appropriate stage for such requests had passed. This case underscores the significance of adhering to procedural laws in civil litigation, ensuring that applications are specific and aligned with the relevant legal provisions. Keywords: Civil Procedure Code, document production, legal framework, procedural guidelines, civil litigation.
Court High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MUHAMMAD ALAM, JUSTICE
Lawyers Latif Shah
Petitioners MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN
Respondents 8 OTHERS, CHIEF SECRETARY/REVENUE COMMISSIONER, G.B. GILGIT
Citations 2016 SLD 1410, 2016 MLD 240
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Sections O.XI,R.14