Case ID |
02d8c1ac-d05f-42dd-b91c-e19b317dc468 |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
Appeal No.603(R) of 1998 |
Decision Date |
Dec 09, 1998 |
Hearing Date |
Dec 07, 1998 |
Decision |
The appeal was dismissed as the appellant had no cause for grievance. The Tribunal highlighted that a deputationist does not have a vested right to remain on a post indefinitely. The facts revealed that the appellant was reverted to his original post and was placed in his earlier grade and status, which indicated that he was not aggrieved by the decision. The reliance on previous case law was deemed inappropriate as it did not align with the circumstances of this case. |
Summary |
In this case, the Federal Service Tribunal dealt with the appeal of an employee who had been reverted from a deputation position back to his original post. The crux of the matter was whether the appellant had any grounds to claim that his reversion was unjust. The Tribunal ruled that a deputationist does not have an inherent right to remain in a foreign post indefinitely and emphasized that the appellant had been restored to his original position with the same grade and status. The decision referenced previous rulings to support this stance, ultimately concluding that the appeal was without merit. This case illustrates the legal principles surrounding civil service appointments and the rights of individuals on deputation, highlighting the importance of adhering to established protocols and the legal framework governing employment in public service. |
Court |
Federal Service Tribunal
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
Noor Muhammad Magsi,
Muhammad Ayub Khan,
Muhammad Siddique
|
Lawyers |
M. Javaid Aziz Sandhu,
Pir Muhammad Ishaq,
Sajjad A. Shaikh,
Abdul Hameed Chaudhari
|
Petitioners |
|
Respondents |
2 others,
Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad
|
Citations |
2001 SLD 2014,
2001 PLC 1136
|
Other Citations |
1985 PLC (C.S.) 133,
1998 SCMR 2631
|
Laws Involved |
Not available
|
Sections |
Not available
|