Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 00b4e168-bf7c-45b0-b8fd-420f9b3d9520
Body View case body.
Case Number Regular Second Appeals Nos. 910 and 1036 of 1978
Decision Date Jun 07, 2000
Hearing Date Jun 07, 2000
Decision The Lahore High Court allowed Regular Second Appeal No. 910 of 1978 and set aside the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge dated 27-9-1978, restoring the decree of the trial court dated 17-1-1977. The court concluded that the plaintiff had a superior right of pre-emption based on ownership and kinship to the vendor, and the previous ruling that the case should be transferred to the Collector due to claims of tenancy was invalid as the plaintiff had abandoned that plea during the trial. Regular Second Appeal No. 1036 of 1978 filed by the vendees was dismissed. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs.
Summary This case revolves around the application of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, particularly regarding the rights of pre-emption in the context of real estate transactions. The plaintiff, Ashfaq Ahmad, claimed a superior right of pre-emption based on his status as an owner in the estate and his relationship to the vendor. The trial court initially ruled in his favor, but the appellate court later dismissed the suit, arguing that it should have been transferred to the Collector due to claims of tenancy. However, upon review, the Lahore High Court found that the plaintiff had effectively abandoned the tenancy claim and reaffirmed his superior rights. This case highlights the complexities of property law and the nuances of pre-emption rights, making it a significant reference point for future cases involving similar issues.
Court Lahore High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J
Lawyers Athar Rehman Khan, Kh. Muhammad Akram
Petitioners ASHFAQ AHMAD
Respondents 2 others, GHULAM HUSSAIN
Citations 2001 SLD 686, 2001 CLC 1751
Other Citations PLD 1987 Lah. 268
Laws Involved Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913
Sections 4, 15, 21