| Case ID |
00627ec5-a330-4d9a-9399-ba40575c5df8 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Tax Case No. 522 of 1986 (Reference No. 357 of 198 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 19, 1997 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Madras High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income-tax Officer were valid based on the information provided by the revenue audit. The court distinguished between mere information about the law and the interpretation of the law, establishing that the audit report constituted valid 'information' under section 147(b) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. The court concluded that the audit party had not interpreted the law but merely highlighted the relevant provisions, thus upholding the validity of the reassessment. This decision emphasized the importance of accurate application of tax law and reaffirmed the authority of the Income-tax Officer to reopen assessments when new information is presented, ensuring compliance with tax regulations. |
| Summary |
In the significant case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD., the Madras High Court addressed the complexities surrounding the reassessment of income tax claims. The case revolved around the issue of extra depreciation claimed by the assessee for machinery leased to a hotel. The Income-tax Officer had initially allowed the claim but later initiated reassessment proceedings based on a revenue audit report that indicated the assets were not used in the taxpayer's business. The Tribunal had ruled against the reopening of the assessment, citing that the audit report did not constitute valid information. However, the High Court overturned this decision, clarifying that the audit report simply communicated relevant legal provisions without interpreting them. This ruling highlights the critical distinction between interpretation and communication of tax law, affirming the power of tax authorities to reassess claims when new factual information arises. The decision reaffirms the legal framework governing income tax reassessment, ensuring that taxpayers are held accountable for accurate claims while also safeguarding the integrity of tax administration. |
| Court |
Madras High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal,
Revenue Audit,
Spencer Co.
|
| Judges |
N. V. Balasubramanian,
P. Thangavel
|
| Lawyers |
C.V. Rajan,
,
Mr. Aravind P. Datar
|
| Petitioners |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
|
| Respondents |
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD.
|
| Citations |
2001 SLD 224,
2001 PTD 1784,
(2000) 241 ITR 248,
(2000) 82 TAX 322
|
| Other Citations |
Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT (1979) 119 ITR 996 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,
Indian Income-tax Rules, 1962
|
| Sections |
147(b),
Append. I, Part 1, Item No. III
|