Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 00134130-5787-4c7c-8ea2-c53c40f68e12
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 762-L of 19
Decision Date Nov 21, 1993
Hearing Date
Decision The petitioners sought leave to appeal against the Lahore High Court's judgment dated May 16, 1992, which accepted a Regular Second Appeal, overturned the first appellate court's order, and upheld the trial court's dismissal of the suit for specific performance based on an alleged agreement to sell. The Supreme Court found that the High Court's ruling was substantiated by the evidence on record, and the first appellate court had failed to properly analyze the details of the agreement. The Supreme Court concluded that there were no grounds for interference with the High Court's findings, thereby refusing leave to appeal.
Summary This case involves the interpretation of the Specific Relief Act and the Constitution of Pakistan regarding a petition for leave to appeal against a High Court decision related to a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The Supreme Court of Pakistan analyzed the evidence presented and determined that the High Court's findings were well-supported. The core issue revolved around the validity of an agreement to sell land, dated November 12, 1971, and whether the execution was genuine. The trial court's dismissal of the suit was upheld due to the lack of convincing evidence, and the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of proper evidence analysis in appellate proceedings. This case highlights the significance of legal documentation and the role of courts in ensuring that agreements are substantiated by credible evidence.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved
Judges SHAFIUR RAHMAN, SALEEM AKHTAR
Lawyers
Petitioners , ABDUL RAZZAQ
Respondents RIASAT ALI,
Citations 1994 SLD 739, 1994 SCMR 1116
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Sections 12, 185(3)