Case ID |
000b2186-7141-4b16-a244-81b7bdfedee7 |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
Appeals Nos. 4-A of 1973, 45 of 1974 and 3 of 1975 |
Decision Date |
Nov 03, 1975 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The Tribunal found that the termination of the appellants' services was illegal due to the lack of evidence supporting the allegations of 'subversive activities' and 'anti-social activities'. The Tribunal highlighted that the appellants were not given any notice or opportunity to respond to the allegations against them, which is a violation of the Sind Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973. The appeals were allowed, and the appellants were deemed to be on duty from the date of their suspension, entitled to all service benefits. |
Summary |
The case revolves around the illegal termination of services of three teachers, who were accused of vague allegations of subversive and anti-social activities without any inquiry or proper notice. The Service Tribunal in Sindh ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and adherence to the legal provisions outlined in the Sind Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973. The decision highlights the importance of due process in civil service disciplinary actions, ensuring that civil servants are protected against arbitrary dismissal. Keywords include 'Sind Civil Servants', 'disciplinary action', 'due process', 'service termination', and 'education law'. |
Court |
Service Tribunal, Sindh
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
HAMZO KHAN M. KURESHI (CHAIRMAN),
ABDUL WALI MAKHDOOM (MEMBER)
|
Lawyers |
Not available
|
Petitioners |
ROSHAN ALI,
Mr. Abdullah Atiq,
Mr. Nizamuddin Mahotto,
Mr. Ali Ahmed
|
Respondents |
DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, LARKANA,
Secretary of Education Government of Sind
|
Citations |
1977 SLD 1492,
1977 PLC 8
|
Other Citations |
Not available
|
Laws Involved |
Sind Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973
|
Sections |
4-A,
5
|